Flash Story
Aragosta
Quando l’aragosta era cibo per detenuti
Domiziano, da “dominus et deus” alla damnatio memoriae
World Press Photo 2023, il mondo raccontato per immagini
PerCorti di Vita a Torino
Lucia Annunziata racconta gli “inquilini” degli ultimi 10 anni
Hybris di Rezza e Mastrella a teatro, i due lati della porta
Eminem, 50 anni del bianco che ha segnato il rap
Rachel Carson, agli albori dell’ambientalismo moderno
Il Pride di Bologna e il suo orgoglio
Sheila Ribeiro, arte che invita al “non-dominio sulle cose”
World Press Photo, il fotogiornalismo del 2021
Dario Argento al Museo del Cinema di Torino
Non mi lascio commuovere dalle fotografie – la mostra per i 100 anni di Pasolini
Anni Interessanti, l’Italia 1960-1975
Armi biologiche: da Wuhan alla guerra in Ucraina
Romics, dai Millennials alla Generazione Z
Sport e politica, l’arma del boicottaggio
Se i proverbi se la prendono (solo) con le donne
Il dispotico smartphone
biancaneve
La “dittatura” del politicamente corretto (nun se po’ più dì)
Perché ci sentiamo in obbligo di giustificare il violento?
0 like prateek katyal
Il giornalismo sui social e la gestione del conflitto
logo mundialito 1980
Uruguay 1980, the P2 Lodge, football and the Gold Cup (on TV)
“Definire è limitare”
Bambine-streghe, quando le “catene del pregiudizio” sono reali
Inferno a Roma, quando il Diavolo non ci faceva paura
Trascrittori forensi, “chiediamo giustizia alla Giustizia”
“Duel” a Palazzo Merulana, Amici miei vs Compagni di scuola
new york skyline 11 settembre torri gemelle
11 settembre 2001, i 20 anni dall’attentato
rambaldi profondo rosso
Horror movies, the fine line between trash and cult
Europei di calcio, dalla Guerra Fredda all’edizione condivisa
Trap, giovani e società

New media, old issues

We’re used to think that first internet and then the social media revolutionized and democratized the entertainment and the information world, making any other previous media obsolete. But that’s not fully correct, because, if the tool is surely way faster and more widespread, dynamics behind its use are basically the same as always.

A first false myth is the supposed internet egalitarianism. It’s true that, potentially, each one of us can make his or her voice heard, create a successful website or blog, reach millions of people and spread viral contents. That’s just an updated American dream, the errand boy becomes a top manager. It’s not impossible, someone fulfilled their goals, but it’s unlikely.

Comparing the web to radio, TV and the press, it’s much easier for an average person to start his or her project almost for free. You don’t necessarily have to rent facilities or pay for expensive equipment. That doesn’t mean you don’t have to possess entrepreneurial skills, keep up to date on the constant progress in this field, study the latest techniques for more views (and money), maintain high standards to not disappear after two weeks.Free social media pigs product

So, it’s not automatic to stand out with interesting, clever, particular things to say, you also have to use the market laws to your advantage. Just like happens with TV, radio, press.

But that goes for the economic aspects, not everyone wants to earn from the internet. Social media as well aren’t the same for each one of us and that’s an easy call. Having millions of followers is different from having 50, 100, 500 or even 3 thousand of them in terms of communication coverage. And again, more followers is not equal as better content.

Other similarities between new and old media concern fake news. One side is worried about the spread of lies through the web, the other side replies that the traditional media were the unreliable ones, subjected to bigger interests. Both sides are right and wrong at the same time, media are just tools (medium in Latin means instrument), propaganda makes the difference between a good and a bad use of them.

Another (partially) false myth is the increasing information thanks to the internet. On the one hand we have a better access to any source, national or foreign, at any time of the day. On the other hand, news aggregators, as well as social media, tend to create bubbles in which we strengthen our opinions instead of questioning them. On the long term that jeopardizes curiosity, the will to explore among topics and opinions we didn’t consider before.

At least it’s all for free. But also radio and some TV channels are for free, those networks earns from the commercials. The audience doesn’t pay actual money but becoming a commodity, a number that adjusts the market. Social media do the same, they are apparently free, it’s our presence that brings ads and money.

citizen kane orson welles
Citizen Kane, the 1941 movie by Orson Welles about the control of media on the public

But there is a slight difference. A TV, a radio, has to broadcast something, a show, a movie, an event, sports. Social media don’t directly produce content, users do. And they don’t take part in redistribution of the profit. Of course social media are for free, no worker pays to enter in the factory (that’s obviously a hyperbole).

Technologies remain an instrument, manipulable by humans who responds the same old logic. Every “new” media has been looked upon with both hope and suspicion and presented the same issues. We’ve been told that many times, just think of movies like Citizen Kane (1941) or Network (1976) to realize how little the situation has changed.

 


Back To Top