Flash Story
Aragosta
Quando l’aragosta era cibo per detenuti
Domiziano, da “dominus et deus” alla damnatio memoriae
World Press Photo 2023, il mondo raccontato per immagini
PerCorti di Vita a Torino
Lucia Annunziata racconta gli “inquilini” degli ultimi 10 anni
Hybris di Rezza e Mastrella a teatro, i due lati della porta
Eminem, 50 anni del bianco che ha segnato il rap
Rachel Carson, agli albori dell’ambientalismo moderno
Il Pride di Bologna e il suo orgoglio
Sheila Ribeiro, arte che invita al “non-dominio sulle cose”
World Press Photo, il fotogiornalismo del 2021
Dario Argento al Museo del Cinema di Torino
Non mi lascio commuovere dalle fotografie – la mostra per i 100 anni di Pasolini
Anni Interessanti, l’Italia 1960-1975
Armi biologiche: da Wuhan alla guerra in Ucraina
Romics, dai Millennials alla Generazione Z
Sport e politica, l’arma del boicottaggio
Se i proverbi se la prendono (solo) con le donne
Il dispotico smartphone
biancaneve
La “dittatura” del politicamente corretto (nun se po’ più dì)
Perché ci sentiamo in obbligo di giustificare il violento?
0 like prateek katyal
Il giornalismo sui social e la gestione del conflitto
logo mundialito 1980
Uruguay 1980, the P2 Lodge, football and the Gold Cup (on TV)
“Definire è limitare”
Bambine-streghe, quando le “catene del pregiudizio” sono reali
Inferno a Roma, quando il Diavolo non ci faceva paura
Trascrittori forensi, “chiediamo giustizia alla Giustizia”
“Duel” a Palazzo Merulana, Amici miei vs Compagni di scuola
new york skyline 11 settembre torri gemelle
11 settembre 2001, i 20 anni dall’attentato
rambaldi profondo rosso
Horror movies, the fine line between trash and cult
Europei di calcio, dalla Guerra Fredda all’edizione condivisa
Trap, giovani e società

Entertainment and its responsibilities

It’s been a little while since more recent or older movies and TV series get watched with current standards. The last victim is Gone with the wind, that has been suspended from HBO catalog and will reappear with disclaimers for “ethnic and racial prejudices” and “product of its times”. But even popular and apparently harmless shows like How I met your mother and Friends had been criticized for their (alleged) sexist, homophobic, transphobic messages and/or fat shaming.

On the one hand it’s totally fine to analyze and re-interpret productions from the past, to understand differences and similarities between societies. On the other hand, the politically correct censorial wave, which stems from movements that are fundamental for our collective growth, sometimes has no solid bases. Sometimes we just have to understand the temporal and narrative context, giving pure entertainment the proper value. Basically, there isn’t just one, univocal truth.

One premise. Radical change, whether it’s violent, like French and Russian Revolution, or non violent like most movements for emancipation, need a time frame before they reach a balanced settlement. The same goes for politically correct, not everyone understood why, when or how to use it. Those who use it to control language are extreme as well as those who refuse it no matter what, to maintain the right to insult. The fact is that considering each case individually costs more efforts than just saying “never say this or that”.

So, we can say that we are experiencing this settlement phase, from a society to another, from many kinds of discrimination to hasty justicialism that involves even entertaining TV series.

Shows like How I met your mother and Friends are more or less twenty years old, not much compared to Gone with the wind (1939). Society wasn’t that different from these days, but certain topics weren’t totally discussed or solved. Or, at least, making some kind of jokes wasn’t taboo.

friends sessismo omofobia
One of the (many) tweets that accuses Friends of homophobia and sexism

Beside the temporal context, we have to consider the rules (or suggestions) of comedy. A screenplay works better is there is some kind of conflict, if characters are three-dimensional – the good vs the evil rhetoric works for Mickey Mouse and superheroes. Sometimes comedy conveys the message by contrast, getting to some kind of “moral” by laughing at its opposite. That’s also cathartic, or we remain in a hideous moralism, which might work for reality but not in fiction.

For example, in one of the incriminated Friends episodes, Ross doesn’t want to hire a male baby-sitter, as he thinks that it’s a job for women, he even insinuates that the guy might be a homosexual. If we take this out of its context, it sounds awful.

But: the other characters don’t care about the sex of the baby-sitter, he is good and skilled, that’s it; the episode, in the end, goes against the stereotype of sensitive male = homosexual; Ross himself changes his mind.

Watching a show in which a guy applies for a job, he gets it because he is good and everyone find it normal is just boring. Why losing time with that? And just stopping at Ross’s initial homophobia, without considering the evolution, is simplistic.

The same goes for the fat shaming. Monica was overweight as adolescent, mocked by her peers, and in an episode a parallel reality is imagined, in which she doesn’t lose weight. In the end, she gets engaged with Chandler anyway, because the moral is: physical appearance isn’t the only yardstick.

how i met your mother citazioni
Quotes from “How I met your mother”. If taken out of their context it looks sexist

Transphobia: Chandler is ashamed of his father, who changed sex and performs as a drag queen in Las Vegas. Who would accept easily such big news? Plus, the job is surely honest, but a bit trash – regardless of the sex change operation. Plus, once again, without conflict there’s no interest in entertainment.

Many Friends defenders also remember how the show spoke, in its light and funny tones, about topics like same sex marriages and surrogate motherhood. That doesn’t go only for Friends, it’s a general discourse, same logic for any show. A creative process needs to be considered in a different way, it’s not reality. The line is subtle, still there is one.

The debate on how entertainment influences the public will go on for a long time. But without a constant and in-depth exercise of critical abilities, from a personal perspective before a collective one, we won’t go far.


Back To Top