Flash Story
Aragosta
Quando l’aragosta era cibo per detenuti
Domiziano, da “dominus et deus” alla damnatio memoriae
World Press Photo 2023, il mondo raccontato per immagini
PerCorti di Vita a Torino
Lucia Annunziata racconta gli “inquilini” degli ultimi 10 anni
Hybris di Rezza e Mastrella a teatro, i due lati della porta
Eminem, 50 anni del bianco che ha segnato il rap
Rachel Carson, agli albori dell’ambientalismo moderno
Il Pride di Bologna e il suo orgoglio
Sheila Ribeiro, arte che invita al “non-dominio sulle cose”
World Press Photo, il fotogiornalismo del 2021
Dario Argento al Museo del Cinema di Torino
Non mi lascio commuovere dalle fotografie – la mostra per i 100 anni di Pasolini
Anni Interessanti, l’Italia 1960-1975
Armi biologiche: da Wuhan alla guerra in Ucraina
Romics, dai Millennials alla Generazione Z
Sport e politica, l’arma del boicottaggio
Se i proverbi se la prendono (solo) con le donne
Il dispotico smartphone
biancaneve
La “dittatura” del politicamente corretto (nun se po’ più dì)
Perché ci sentiamo in obbligo di giustificare il violento?
0 like prateek katyal
Il giornalismo sui social e la gestione del conflitto
logo mundialito 1980
Uruguay 1980, the P2 Lodge, football and the Gold Cup (on TV)
“Definire è limitare”
Bambine-streghe, quando le “catene del pregiudizio” sono reali
Inferno a Roma, quando il Diavolo non ci faceva paura
Trascrittori forensi, “chiediamo giustizia alla Giustizia”
“Duel” a Palazzo Merulana, Amici miei vs Compagni di scuola
new york skyline 11 settembre torri gemelle
11 settembre 2001, i 20 anni dall’attentato
rambaldi profondo rosso
Horror movies, the fine line between trash and cult
Europei di calcio, dalla Guerra Fredda all’edizione condivisa
Trap, giovani e società

Mass tourism, detrimental and democratic

Mass tourism is definitely ruining the landscape integrity or the identity of many places all around the world. On the one hand degradation and pollution of uncontaminated locations – beaches, mountains, forests, rivers – on the other hand the depersonalization of cities, with standardized stores which recall the “non places” described by Marc Augé – why travel in the first place if we find the same things everywhere?

But, as always, we point the finger at the usual, wrong scapegoats: low cost airlines and rental platforms of sharing economy. Which are far from being perfect, no doubt, but they somehow democratized tourism, allowing travels for more social classes thanks to reasonable fares.

Japan, another country with problems brought by mass tourism

Tourists are way to much, but for deeper reasons. The planet is overpopulated and our species is growing at an impressive rate: just 40 years ago we were 4 billions, now we’re doubled. Basically one billion more every decade, while in the past it took centuries to reach the same numbers. This phenomenon is unmanageable from many points of view: economy, resources, environment, emissions. Plus, there are geopolitical changes, western countries lost some of their privileges.

So, if only few years ago only rich Europeans could afford a vacation, now there is a larger turnout, made also of lower classes, Asians, Australians, Americans, Africans and so on. How can we decide who’s got the right to travel or when he/she can do it?

The effect of exclusive tourism in Acapulco, Mexico. Not better than mass tourism…

Cities like Venice host an excessive number of tourists and that changed the habits and the genuineness of that town. But at the same time, business owners complain about tourists spending only few money to eat or sleep. That’s surely an elitist vision. Culture shouldn’t be totally free, at least to cover the expenses of maintenance or to pay the employees. But availability of culture must be as wider as possible.

Wealth can’t be a discriminating factor to decide who can or cannot travel, we can all agree on that. At the same way, there can’t be a cultural discrimination. Of course the world is full of people who only travel for status, not caring or understanding traditions and peculiarities of a country. But, with an optimistic vision, that could be an opportunity for everyone to emancipate and learn something. Denying that would mean accepting a social immobility. We just can’t be that arrogant.

The main point is respecting people and places and that surely doesn’t depend on money. On the contrary, luxury tourism caused depersonalization and gentrification more than Airbnb or Ryanair did – the original intention was to make travelers live like a local, then this was a bit lost.

The worst effect of mass tourism, giant cruise ships in the small Venice lagoon

It seems that administrations leave the burden only to individual citizens, avoiding responsibilities. If an average downtown offers more for tourists than residents, institutions should intervene. If giant cruise ships show up and ruin Venice lagoon it means that someone gave them permission. If in Aruba or Acapulco you can find skyscrapers right on the beach, someone gave licenses. But for politics it’s easier to divert attentions from their faults and blame someone else.

Changing is scary, it’s a natural feeling. Mass tourism is a product of social, economic, geographic transformations and adjustment takes time, resources and efforts. So, in the name of an unbearable status quo, the problem is reduced to elitist positions that go against those who, just few years ago, could only have dreamed of a day trip.

 


Back To Top