Flash Story
Aragosta
Quando l’aragosta era cibo per detenuti
Domiziano, da “dominus et deus” alla damnatio memoriae
World Press Photo 2023, il mondo raccontato per immagini
PerCorti di Vita a Torino
Lucia Annunziata racconta gli “inquilini” degli ultimi 10 anni
Hybris di Rezza e Mastrella a teatro, i due lati della porta
Eminem, 50 anni del bianco che ha segnato il rap
Rachel Carson, agli albori dell’ambientalismo moderno
Il Pride di Bologna e il suo orgoglio
Sheila Ribeiro, arte che invita al “non-dominio sulle cose”
World Press Photo, il fotogiornalismo del 2021
Dario Argento al Museo del Cinema di Torino
Non mi lascio commuovere dalle fotografie – la mostra per i 100 anni di Pasolini
Anni Interessanti, l’Italia 1960-1975
Armi biologiche: da Wuhan alla guerra in Ucraina
Romics, dai Millennials alla Generazione Z
Sport e politica, l’arma del boicottaggio
Se i proverbi se la prendono (solo) con le donne
Il dispotico smartphone
biancaneve
La “dittatura” del politicamente corretto (nun se po’ più dì)
Perché ci sentiamo in obbligo di giustificare il violento?
0 like prateek katyal
Il giornalismo sui social e la gestione del conflitto
logo mundialito 1980
Uruguay 1980, the P2 Lodge, football and the Gold Cup (on TV)
“Definire è limitare”
Bambine-streghe, quando le “catene del pregiudizio” sono reali
Inferno a Roma, quando il Diavolo non ci faceva paura
Trascrittori forensi, “chiediamo giustizia alla Giustizia”
“Duel” a Palazzo Merulana, Amici miei vs Compagni di scuola
new york skyline 11 settembre torri gemelle
11 settembre 2001, i 20 anni dall’attentato
rambaldi profondo rosso
Horror movies, the fine line between trash and cult
Europei di calcio, dalla Guerra Fredda all’edizione condivisa
Trap, giovani e società

The law of Jante

We are used to think of Scandinavian Social Democracies as one of the best political models around the world, able to conjugate collectivism and liberalism. Probably not a perfect system – perfection is more of a utopia – but we haven’t seen much better yet. It’s a common belief that the main pillar of Social Democracy is the Law of Jante, a decalogue created by the Danish writer Aksel Sandemose in his novel of 1933 A Fugitive Crosses His Tracks.

The Law of Jante is a anti-individualist manifesto which takes its name from the imaginary city of Jante, representation of Nykøbing Mors, Sandemose’s town. This small and closed community was against the emerging of high standing personalities and, to avoid that, protected itself with a bunch of harsh rules:

  • You’re not to think you are anything special

  • You’re not to think you are as good as we are

  • You’re not to think you are smarter than we are

  • You’re not to imagine yourself better than we are

  • You’re not to think you know more than we do

  • You’re not to think you are more important than we are

  • You’re not to think you are good at anything

  • You’re not to laugh at us

  • You’re not to think anyone cares about you

  • You’re not to think you can teach us anything

    High poppy syndrome

Plus the special regulation: Perhaps you don’t think we know a few things about you? Despite the Danish origin, these precepts affected in particular the Swedish culture, especially for what concerns working environments, to guarantee harmony and uniformity. Obviously, Swedish people deny that and refer to it in a negative way, as it ruins personal initiatives. Anyway, the strong rejection indicates that somehow everyone has to do with the Law of Jante.

In the end, Sandemos took to extremes the stereotypes inside Scandinavian societies of the first half of XX century, that weakened through the years. But he left an important footprint, as anyone knows, in this region, his piece of literature.

The Swedish writer Stefan Ekberg even replied with his book Skit I Jantelagen, where Jantelagen means law of Jante and skit is pretty easily understandable because of the middle finger of the cover. Whether you talk about it seriously or ironically, this concept of social leveling is deeply rooted in those latitudes.

Crabs in a bucket

But actually is not alien to other cultures. In England they talk about the self-explaining “high poppy syndrome” and in the United States there is the attitude of the “crabs in a bucket”, after the behavior of those crustaceans that take back their fellows when they are trying to escape from their prison. Just a couple examples that show how, everywhere, thinking that homogenisation is better is frequent.

Basically, the satirical intent of Sandemose had always been ignored, so there were real attempts to correlate the Law of Jante with all the political theories of the last century. When, actually, is nothing serious, it’s just satire.

 


Back To Top