Flash Story
Aragosta
Quando l’aragosta era cibo per detenuti
Domiziano, da “dominus et deus” alla damnatio memoriae
World Press Photo 2023, il mondo raccontato per immagini
PerCorti di Vita a Torino
Lucia Annunziata racconta gli “inquilini” degli ultimi 10 anni
Hybris di Rezza e Mastrella a teatro, i due lati della porta
Eminem, 50 anni del bianco che ha segnato il rap
Rachel Carson, agli albori dell’ambientalismo moderno
Il Pride di Bologna e il suo orgoglio
Sheila Ribeiro, arte che invita al “non-dominio sulle cose”
World Press Photo, il fotogiornalismo del 2021
Dario Argento al Museo del Cinema di Torino
Non mi lascio commuovere dalle fotografie – la mostra per i 100 anni di Pasolini
Anni Interessanti, l’Italia 1960-1975
Armi biologiche: da Wuhan alla guerra in Ucraina
Romics, dai Millennials alla Generazione Z
Sport e politica, l’arma del boicottaggio
Se i proverbi se la prendono (solo) con le donne
Il dispotico smartphone
biancaneve
La “dittatura” del politicamente corretto (nun se po’ più dì)
Perché ci sentiamo in obbligo di giustificare il violento?
0 like prateek katyal
Il giornalismo sui social e la gestione del conflitto
logo mundialito 1980
Uruguay 1980, the P2 Lodge, football and the Gold Cup (on TV)
“Definire è limitare”
Bambine-streghe, quando le “catene del pregiudizio” sono reali
Inferno a Roma, quando il Diavolo non ci faceva paura
Trascrittori forensi, “chiediamo giustizia alla Giustizia”
“Duel” a Palazzo Merulana, Amici miei vs Compagni di scuola
new york skyline 11 settembre torri gemelle
11 settembre 2001, i 20 anni dall’attentato
rambaldi profondo rosso
Horror movies, the fine line between trash and cult
Europei di calcio, dalla Guerra Fredda all’edizione condivisa
Trap, giovani e società

The sixth branch

The fourth branch of the Government is free press, the fifth is about free speech. The internet can combine them, creating a sort of sixth branch. But the real and the ideal not always coincide…

1941, Orson Welles writes Citizen Kane, a movie that exposes the manipulation by newspapers on the public. 1976, Sidney Lumet directs Network, a film about the influence of television. A few decades later the internet era starts and finally there is the possibility of a counter information: a revolution against the propaganda of the ruling power, a blow struck to the establishment. Or so we are told. Would it change much if we replaced newspapers and TV, the targets of them two flicks, with the web?

Yes and no. We went from “it’s true, the newspaper wrote that”, to “it’s true, I heard it on TV” to “it’s true, I read it on the internet”. But the mechanism somehow changed. Traditional media (radio, press, television) deliver the news top-down. The internet, despite is becoming traditional too, overturned the perspective and guaranteed a more participated system of shared information, in respect of the fourth and fifth branch of the Government: free press and free citizenry, or freedom of expression. The web combines them, creating a sort of virtual space that we could call the “sixth branch”.

Citizen Kane, the first movie about the control of media on the public

There is a downside, though. What it seems an idyllic vision, could hide a snare. For the first time, the freedom of expression is endangered by the excess of itself. Like they say in the criminal underworld, “if everybody is in charge, nobody is in charge”. The same, if everybody is talking, nobody is talking, everything is lost in the ether. If we want to be malicious, we could say that it’s a subtle strategy created by the so called establishment to feed the illusion of freedom. But that would slide into conspiracy theories.

Nevertheless, we have another aspect to consider, the discredit that the internet has, for the bunch of fake news, trolls and whatever connected to them. Of course, saying that everything you find out there is a fraud is as far from real as saying that everything is perfectly believable. In the web there’s a lot of garbage, sure, but also many interesting voices, not necessarily the online version of already successful printed magazines. Pointing the finger just on the negative sides portraits a partial and misleading picture.

The “sixth branch” hasn’t expressed it’s full potential yet, not only for the dead weight previously described, but also because it keeps a hierarchical system. Do we really think that an average Joe counts like a famous opinion leader? Having good ideas is not enough, you still have to possess the technological know-how to exploit this media as best as possible. So, nothing different from ambitious people using the TV to achieve visibility and fame. Not something that anyone is able to do.

We had other illusions with the “Arab Springs” or some other revolutions attempted, in Iran and Venezuela, for example. At the beginning it seemed that the internet and social media had the real opportunity to bring a real political and social change, in Syria, Egypt, Tunisia. Young people, students, women, the outcasts of the arena, were finally allowed to strongly express their disappointment against their corrupted administrations. We know how it ended, well-organized groups actually took the lead, with a disastrous outcome.

But we have to maintain a certain level of optimism, hoping that with some adjustments the “sixth branch” would really become this full expression of participated democracy with a new vision of an equal society.


Back To Top